The Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R) is a multidimensional instrument designed to measure the core components of perfectionism in adults and adolescents.
Questions
23
Duration
10 min
Original title
APS-R — Almost Perfect Scale
Adaptation
Almost Perfect Scale-Revised
Authors
Slaney, R. B., Rice, K. G., Mobley, M., Trippi, J., & Ashby, J. S.
Created
2001
The Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R) is a multidimensional instrument designed to measure the core components of perfectionism in adults and adolescents. Developed to distinguish between the adaptive pursuit of excellence and the paralyzing distress of perfectionistic failure, it separates personal standards from the critical self-evaluation that drives psychological distress, often acting as a bridge to identifying perfectionism and working with it in session.
In clinical practice, the APS-R is a valuable tool for understanding a patient's internal rules and the distress they cause. By untangling a preference for order, high standards, and the perceived discrepancy between expectations and performance, clinicians can better challenge demanding standards. It provides a repeatable metric to monitor how rigid inner rules soften and self-criticism decreases over the course of treatment, offering clear insights into the cognitive mechanisms maintaining anxiety or low self-worth.
Example result
Fictitious result, computed from a sample set of answers.
The APS-R is a 23-item self-report questionnaire assessing three dimensions of perfectionism: High Standards, preference for Order, and Discrepancy, which refers to the perceived gap between the standards individuals set for themselves and their actual performance. The combination of Standards and Discrepancy scores allows distinguishing between adaptive perfectionism (high standards + low discrepancy), maladaptive perfectionism (high standards + high discrepancy), and non-perfectionists. It is used with adults and adolescents in clinical and research settings to clarify the links between perfectionism, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and academic/occupational functioning.
Discrepancy (Discrepancy)
47/ 84
Discrepancy is defined as the perceived difference between the standards one has for oneself and one's actual performance.
items3, 6, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23
47
1284
Order (Order)
16/ 28
Order represents a preference for organization and neatness, a secondary positive aspect of perfectionism.
items2, 4, 7, 10
16
428
High personal standards (High Standards)
24/ 49
High standards captures the essential and defining positive aspects of perfectionism, representing the positive striving and expectations one has for oneself.
items1, 5, 8, 12, 14, 18, 22
24
749
Have your patient take this test
Assign it in one click: your patient answers on their phone, you receive the score and its interpretation.
The APS-R assesses three distinct facets of perfectionistic thinking, helping clinicians map the cognitive structures driving a patient's behavior and self-evaluation.
High Standards: The degree to which an individual expects excellent performance and sets demanding personal goals.
Order: A preference for neatness, organization, and a disciplined approach to tasks and environments.
Discrepancy: The distressing gap between one's expectations and one's actual performance, capturing the chronic dissatisfaction often fueled by disqualifying the positive.
This measure is intended for adults and adolescents capable of self-reflection, particularly those presenting with anxiety, depression, or burnout.
When and why to use it
Clinicians typically deploy the APS-R to map the patient's internal demands, clarify the source of their distress, and monitor cognitive flexibility throughout therapy.
Clinical Indication
Rationale for Use
Intake baseline
To establish a detailed profile of a patient's perfectionistic traits, separating healthy ambition from punitive self-evaluation.
To focus therapeutic work precisely where it is needed—often on the distress of discrepancy rather than the mere preference for order.
Cognitive defusion
To help patients objectify their self-criticism, moving them away from harmful rumination and toward flexible evaluation.
Using this validated metric allows clinicians to objectify the specific dimensions of perfectionism, going beyond the vague clinical impression of a patient being overly harsh on themselves.
Clinical library
750+ clinical tools
A library built with and for clinicians, ready to use in session and extend between appointments.