Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness
Interoceptive awareness plays a fundamental role in emotion regulation and psychological well-being.
Questions
32
Duration
10 min
Original title
MAIA — Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness
Adaptation
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness
Authors
Mehling, W.E., Price, C., Daubenmier, J.J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E. & Stewart, A.
Created
2012
Interoceptive awareness plays a fundamental role in emotion regulation and psychological well-being. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) provides clinicians with a nuanced profile of how a person relates to their internal somatic signals. Rather than measuring objective interoceptive accuracy like heartbeat detection, it captures the subjective and experiential relationship the individual has with their body.
Developed by Mehling and colleagues in 2012, this 32-item validated measure breaks down body awareness into eight distinct facets, distinguishing between simply noticing sensations and the regulatory strategies used when discomfort arises. For example, it highlights the clinical difference between noticing a sensation with anxiety versus noticing it with acceptance.
By capturing this complexity, the MAIA is particularly valuable in therapeutic approaches targeting nervous system regulation, trauma, anxiety, and eating disorders. It helps clinicians establish a baseline and track shifts in how patients inhabit their bodies over the course of care, ensuring that interventions remain closely aligned with the patient's evolving somatic capacities.
Example result
Fictitious result, computed from a sample set of answers.
The MAIA is a 32-item, 8-subscale state-trait questionnaire designed to measure multiple dimensions of interoception through self-report, published in November 2012. The eight subscales assess: the tendency to notice positive, negative, and neutral bodily sensations (Noticing); the tendency to acknowledge or ignore sensations of discomfort/pain (Not-Distracting); the extent to which sensations of discomfort provoke worry (Not-Worrying); the perceived degree of control and sustained attention toward bodily sensations (Attention Regulation); awareness of the links between bodily states and emotional states (Emotional Awareness); the tendency to soothe distress via attention to bodily sensations (Self-Regulation); active listening to bodily sensations for insight (Body Listening); and the extent to which bodily sensations are considered safe and trustworthy (Trusting). A useful tool in research and clinical practice, particularly with patients followed in mind-body approaches, mindfulness, chronic pain, eating disorders, anxiety, depression, and somatic trauma.
Noticing (Noticing)
1.5/ 5
Perception of pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral bodily sensations.
items1, 2, 3, 4
généralemixed · community sample · United States · n = 325 · 2012 · Mehling et al. (2012)
05
1.5
M = 3.94 ± 0.59
cliniquemixed · pathology: Eating disorders · United States · n = 362 · 2017 · Brown et al. (2017)
05
1.5
M = 3.14 ± 1.15
Trusting (Trusting)
2/ 5
Experience of one's body as safe and trustworthy.
items30, 31, 32
généralemixed · community sample · United States · n = 325 · 2012 · Mehling et al. (2012)
05
2
M = 4.13 ± 0.74
cliniquemixed · pathology: Eating disorders · United States · n = 362 · 2017 · Brown et al. (2017)
05
2
M = 1.73 ± 1.55
Not-Worrying (Not-Worrying)
2/ 5
Tendency not to worry or experience distress in response to sensations of pain or discomfort.
items8, 9, 10
généralemixed · community sample · United States · n = 325 · 2012 · Mehling et al. (2012)
05
2
M = 3.27 ± 0.84
cliniquemixed · pathology: Eating disorders · United States · n = 362 · 2017 · Brown et al. (2017)
05
2
M = 2.39 ± 1.17
Body Listening (Body Listening)
3/ 5
Active listening to the body for insight.
items27, 28, 29
généralemixed · community sample · United States · n = 325 · 2012 · Mehling et al. (2012)
05
3
M = 3.5 ± 0.87
cliniquemixed · pathology: Eating disorders · United States · n = 362 · 2017 · Brown et al. (2017)
05
3
M = 1.72 ± 1.35
Not-Distracting (Not-Distracting)
3/ 5
Tendency not to ignore or distract oneself from sensations of pain or discomfort.
items5, 6, 7
généralemixed · community sample · United States · n = 325 · 2012 · Mehling et al. (2012)
05
3
M = 3.2 ± 0.87
cliniquemixed · pathology: Eating disorders · United States · n = 362 · 2017 · Brown et al. (2017)
05
3
M = 2.12 ± 1.18
Self-Regulation (Self-Regulation)
2.5/ 5
Ability to regulate psychological distress by paying attention to bodily sensations.
items23, 24, 25, 26
généralemixed · community sample · United States · n = 325 · 2012 · Mehling et al. (2012)
05
2.5
M = 3.86 ± 0.74
cliniquemixed · pathology: Eating disorders · United States · n = 362 · 2017 · Brown et al. (2017)
05
2.5
M = 2.08 ± 1.34
Emotional Awareness (Emotional Awareness)
2.2/ 5
Awareness of the connection between bodily sensations and emotional states.
items18, 19, 20, 21, 22
généralemixed · community sample · United States · n = 325 · 2012 · Mehling et al. (2012)
05
2.2
M = 4.16 ± 0.64
cliniquemixed · pathology: Eating disorders · United States · n = 362 · 2017 · Brown et al. (2017)
05
2.2
M = 2.88 ± 1.22
Attention Regulation (Attention Regulation)
2.714/ 5
Ability to sustain and control attention to bodily sensations.
items11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
généralemixed · community sample · United States · n = 325 · 2012 · Mehling et al. (2012)
05
2.714
M = 3.79 ± 0.64
cliniquemixed · pathology: Eating disorders · United States · n = 362 · 2017 · Brown et al. (2017)
05
2.714
M = 2.33 ± 1.22
Have your patient take this test
Assign it in one click: your patient answers on their phone, you receive the score and its interpretation.
The MAIA assesses interoceptive awareness across eight distinct but interrelated dimensions, capturing both the sensory perception of bodily states and the cognitive and emotional reactions to them.
Noticing: The basic ability to perceive and identify physical sensations.
Not-Distracting: The tendency to stay present with rather than default to avoidance behavior when facing physical discomfort.
Not-Worrying: The capacity to experience unpleasant somatic signals without catastrophic thinking or emotional distress.
Attention Regulation: The ability to direct, sustain, and consciously control focus on internal physical states.
Emotional Awareness: The recognition of how emotional fluctuations manifest as physiological shifts.
Self-Regulation: The active use of body awareness and somatic focus to manage distress and stay within a functional window of tolerance.
Body Listening: The tendency to actively tune into somatic signals for insight into one's emotional or psychological state.
Trusting: The overarching sense that the body is a safe, reliable, and fundamentally sound anchor.
The instrument is validated for adults and is widely used across both general and clinical populations, particularly to guide and evaluate mind and body interventions.
When and why to use it
Clinicians incorporate the MAIA to evaluate how a patient relates to their physical experience and to guide the selection of targeted somatic exercises.
Intake baseline for somatic therapies: Provides a comprehensive profile of body awareness strengths and deficits to tailor treatment planning.
Monitoring intervention effects: Tracks longitudinal changes in response to mindfulness or trauma-informed care to see if a patient becomes less reactive to physical discomfort.
Differentiating hypervigilance from mindful awareness: Helps distinguish between anxious bodily monitoring and adaptive somatic grounding.
By breaking interoception into discrete regulatory and perceptual factors, a validated MAIA score offers a far more actionable map than a general clinical impression of being disconnected from the body.
Clinical library
750+ clinical tools
A library built with and for clinicians, ready to use in session and extend between appointments.