The Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32) is a validated 32-item screening instrument developed to detect past hypomanic episodes, particularly in patients who…
Questions
32
Duration
10 min
Original title
Hypomania Checklist – 32 items (HCL-32)
Adaptation
Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32)
Authors
Angst J., Adolfsson R., Benazzi F., Gamma A., Hantouche E., Meyer T.D., Skeppar P., Vieta E., Scott J.
Created
2005
The Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32) is a validated 32-item screening instrument developed to detect past hypomanic episodes, particularly in patients who present with depressive symptoms. Because individuals rarely complain about periods of elevated mood, hypomania is frequently missed, leading to lengthy delays in accurate diagnosis and inappropriate pharmacological management.
This clinician-administered tool maps the behavioral, cognitive, and emotional shifts that characterize hypomania. It asks patients to focus on their past "high" periods independently of their current mood state. When contextualized within a thorough clinical interview, the HCL-32 helps clinicians systematically spot bipolar disorder warning signs and distinguish unipolar depression from bipolar spectrum presentations. By establishing this baseline, mental health professionals can better tailor bipolar disorder interventions to the patient's actual clinical needs.
Example result
Fictitious result, computed from a sample set of answers.
Overall score
16/ 32
The HCL-32 is a self-report screening questionnaire for lifetime hypomanic symptoms, designed in particular to identify bipolar components in patients presenting with a major depressive episode, specifically bipolar II disorder. It explores current mood state, habitual temperament, as well as the frequency, duration, and consequences of "highs" and the reactions of significant others. It consists of 32 binary (yes/no) items covering mood, energy, activity, cognition, behavior, and substance use.
généralemixed · general population · non-clinical sample (students/young adults) · Germany · n = 695 · 2007 · Meyer et al. (2007)
032
16
M = 16.25 ± 4.4
généralefemale · general population · non-clinical sample (students/young adults) · Germany · n = 374 · 2007 · Meyer et al. (2007)
032
16
M = 16.54 ± 4.16
généralemale · general population · non-clinical sample (students/young adults) · Germany · n = 321 · 2007 · Meyer et al. (2007)
032
16
M = 15.91 ± 4.64
généralemixed · general population · non-clinical sample (general population 35–85 years) · 35–85 years · Sweden · n = 408 · 2007 · Meyer et al. (2007)
032
16
M = 14.63 ± 4.82
généralefemale · general population · non-clinical sample (general population 35–85 years) · 35–85 years · Sweden · n = 196 · 2007 · Meyer et al. (2007)
032
16
M = 14.5 ± 4.8
généralemale · general population · non-clinical sample (general population 35–85 years) · 35–85 years · Sweden · n = 212 · 2007 · Meyer et al. (2007)
032
16
M = 14.76 ± 4.84
cliniquemixed · condition: Major depressive episode · patients in a major depressive episode (5 regions) · International (Iberia, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, North Africa/Middle East, Far East) · n = 5606 · 2013 · Gamma et al. (2013)
032
16
M = 13.7 ± 8.63
cliniquemixed · condition: Bipolar disorder · bipolar patients (DSM-IV-TR) in a depressive episode · International (Iberia, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, North Africa/Middle East, Far East) · n = 903 · 2013 · Gamma et al. (2013)
032
16
M = 20.2 ± 6.37
cliniquemixed · condition: Unipolar depression · unipolar depression (DSM-IV-TR) · International (Iberia, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, North Africa/Middle East, Far East) · n = 4732 · 2013 · Gamma et al. (2013)
032
16
M = 12.5 ± 8.45
ⓘFor information
Cut-off≥ 14Cross-cultural cut-off for bipolarity (≥ 14)
Cut-off of 14 validated in 5606 patients in a depressive episode across 5 regions of the world: distinguishes between bipolar and unipolar patients (diagnostic specifier), AUC 0.86.
Cut-off≥ 20British cut-off for BP-I vs. recurrent depression (≥ 20)
Stricter cut-off prioritizing specificity, established between bipolar type I patients and recurrently depressed patients without a history of bipolarity.
cliniquemixed · condition: Major depressive episode · patients in a major depressive episode (5 regions) · International (Iberia, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, North Africa/Middle East, Far East) · n = 5606 · 2013 · Gamma et al. (2013)
020
12
M = 10.3 ± 6.52
cliniquemixed · condition: Bipolar disorder · bipolar patients (DSM-IV-TR) in a depressive episode · International (Iberia, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, North Africa/Middle East, Far East) · n = 903 · 2013 · Gamma et al. (2013)
020
12
M = 14.6 ± 4.65
Factor 2 — Risk-taking / irritability
4/ 12
Negative aspect of hypomania: irritability, impulsivity, risk-taking, substance use.
items7, 8, 9, 21, 23, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31, 32
cliniquemixed · condition: Major depressive episode · patients in a major depressive episode (5 regions) · International (Iberia, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, North Africa/Middle East, Far East) · n = 5606 · 2013 · Gamma et al. (2013)
012
4
M = 3.5 ± 3.07
cliniquemixed · condition: Bipolar disorder · bipolar patients (DSM-IV-TR) in a depressive episode · International (Iberia, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, North Africa/Middle East, Far East) · n = 903 · 2013 · Gamma et al. (2013)
012
4
M = 5.6 ± 2.83
cliniquemixed · condition: Unipolar depression · unipolar depression (DSM-IV-TR) · International (Iberia, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, North Africa/Middle East, Far East) · n = 4732 · 2013 · Gamma et al. (2013)
012
4
M = 3.1 ± 2.96
Have your patient take this test
Assign it in one click: your patient answers on their phone, you receive the score and its interpretation.
The HCL-32 systematically surveys the presence of hypomanic symptoms during a patient’s historical "high" periods. It evaluates two primary clinical facets:
Active/elated presentation: Increased goal-directed behavior, heightened sociability, subjective boosts in self-confidence, accelerated thinking, and decreased need for sleep.
Risk-taking/irritable presentation: Elevated impulsivity, substance use, distractibility, interpersonal friction, and reckless behavior that often functions as maladaptive coping.
This measure is intended for adult outpatients, specifically to uncover masked bipolarity in those presenting with recurrent mood complaints.
When and why to use it
Clinicians typically use the HCL-32 when assessing complex mood presentations or treatment-resistant depression. Its primary clinical indications include:
Intake baseline assessment: To establish a comprehensive mood history before initiating therapy, minimizing the risk of treatment-induced manic switching.
Differential support: To clarify diagnoses when historical mood shifts are subtle, ego-syntonic, or absent from the initial longitudinal case formulation.
Screening and cut-off guidance: To flag the need for a deeper exploration of the bipolar spectrum based on established clinical thresholds.
Relying solely on clinical impression can miss hypomanic traits, as patients often view these periods as times of normal or optimal functioning. A validated score provides an objective anchor to explore these states, offering a clear baseline against which clinicians can evaluate coping strategies over time.
Clinical library
750+ clinical tools
A library built with and for clinicians, ready to use in session and extend between appointments.
At different times in their life everyone experiences changes or swings in energy, activity and mood ("highs and lows" or "ups and downs"). The aim of this questionnaire is to assess the characteristics of the "high" periods. Please try to remember a period when you were in a "high" state. How did you feel then? Please answer all these statements independently of your present condition. In such a state:
1. I need less sleep.
Probes for a decreased physiological need for sleep during elevated periods.
Yes
No
2. I feel more energetic and active.
Assesses subjective increases in physical energy and overall activity levels.
Yes
No
3. I feel more self-confident.
Evaluates the presence of inflated self-esteem or grandiosity.
Yes
No
4. I enjoy my work more.
Explores enhanced motivation and pleasure derived from professional or occupational tasks.
Yes
No
5. I'm more sociable (more phone calls, more outings).
Measures increased interpersonal engagement and extroverted behavior.
Yes
No
6. I want to travel and/or I travel more.
Probes for an increased urge or action to travel, reflecting heightened novelty-seeking.
Yes
No
7. I tend to drive faster or take risks while driving.
Assesses reckless behavior and impulsivity behind the wheel.
Yes
No
8. I spend more (or too much) money.
Evaluates poor financial judgment and impulsive spending habits.
Yes
No
9. I take more risks in my daily life (work, other activities).
Measures a generalized increase in risk-taking behaviors across daily domains.
Yes
No
10. I am more physically active (sports, etc.).
Checks for heightened engagement in physical exertion or sports.
Yes
No
11. I plan more projects or activities.
Assesses an overabundance of goal-directed planning and new initiatives.
Yes
No
12. I have more ideas, I am more creative.
Evaluates subjective increases in cognitive fluency and creative output.
Yes
No
13. I am less shy and less inhibited.
Probes for a reduction in social restraint and typical interpersonal boundaries.
Yes
No
14. I wear more colorful and extravagant clothes / I wear more makeup.
Measures changes in personal presentation toward the flamboyant or eccentric.
Yes
No
15. I want to meet more people, or I actually do meet more people.
Assesses a heightened drive for social contact and networking.
Yes
No
16. I am more interested in sex and/or my sexual desire is increased.
Evaluates hypersexuality and elevated libidinal drive.
Yes
No
17. I flirt more and/or my sexual activity is increased.
Probes for the behavioral expression of increased sexual interest.