The Relationship Questionnaire (RQ) is a widely recognized, validated clinical tool designed to evaluate adult attachment styles.
Questions
4
Duration
3 min
Original title
RQ — Relationship Questionnaire
Adaptation
Relationship Questionnaire
Authors
Bartholomew, K. & Horowitz, L. M.
Created
1991
The Relationship Questionnaire (RQ) is a widely recognized, validated clinical tool designed to evaluate adult attachment styles. Originally developed by Bartholomew and Horowitz, this four-item measure captures the core dimensions of how individuals perceive themselves and their partners in close relational contexts. By shifting the clinical focus from a purely narrative history to a measurable framework, the RQ provides a reliable baseline for understanding interpersonal struggles.
For mental health professionals, the RQ offers an efficient method to map a patient's internal working models, isolating patterns of relational avoidance and anxiety. It proves particularly valuable in adult psychotherapy, couples counseling, and interventions targeting chronic interpersonal distress. Integrating this standardized measure allows clinicians to track structural shifts in attachment styles in romantic relationships over the course of treatment, ensuring that the therapeutic focus aligns with the patient's core relational needs.
Example result
Fictitious result, computed from a sample set of answers.
Very brief self-report instrument assessing adult attachment styles, based on the four-category model of Bartholomew and Horowitz (1991): secure, fearful (fearful-avoidant), preoccupied, and dismissing (dismissing-avoidant). Four short prototypical paragraphs each describe an attachment style in close relationships. The individual rates how well each description fits them on a 7-point Likert scale. This allows for both a categorical interpretation (predominant style = highest score) and a dimensional interpretation via two composite scores: model of self and model of others.
Model of self × Model of others→ Dismissing (self +, others −)
Model of self ≥ 0
Model of self < 0
Dismissing (self +, others −)
Prioritizes autonomy and minimizes the importance of bonds: discomfort with intimacy, tendency to keep others at an emotional distance.
Model of others -2 · Model of self 0
Secure (self +, others +)
Comfortable with intimacy as well as autonomy: feels worthy of love and expects others to be available. Relationships are generally stable and trusting.
Fearful (self −, others −)
Desires closeness but fears it due to fear of being hurt: relational avoidance despite the need for connection, mistrust toward self and others.
Preoccupied (self −, others +)
Intense search for closeness and approval, with fear of rejection: tendency toward emotional dependency and abandonment anxiety in relationships.
Model of others < 0
Model of others ≥ 0
The RQ is interpreted in two steps. First, the predominant style: among the four descriptions, the one rated highest by the individual (from 1 to 7)—displayed above, colored bar. Second, the position in Bartholomew's plane: the same four ratings combine into two dimensions, the model of self (positive = positive self-image) and the model of others (positive = trust in others), each ranging from −12 to +12; the identified quadrant crosses the sign of these two dimensions.
Model of self = (Secure + Dismissing) − (Fearful + Preoccupied) ; Model of others = (Secure + Preoccupied) − (Fearful + Dismissing) ; threshold 0 on each dimension.Bartholomew et al. (1991)View the study ↗
Fearful (fearful-avoidant)
2/ 7
Desire for intimacy hindered by fear of being hurt or rejected, negative view of self and others.
items2
cliniquemixed · pathology: Psychiatric disorders · Thailand · n = 168 · 2021 · Wongpakaran et al. (2021)
17
2
M = 4.08 ± 2.15
Dismissing (dismissing-avoidant)
4/ 7
Valuing independence and distancing from intimacy, positive view of self and negative view of others.
items4
cliniquemixed · pathology: Psychiatric disorders · Thailand · n = 168 · 2021 · Wongpakaran et al. (2021)
17
4
M = 3.68 ± 1.8
Preoccupied (preoccupied)
3/ 7
Intense need for closeness and approval, negative view of self and positive view of others.
items3
cliniquemixed · pathology: Psychiatric disorders · Thailand · n = 168 · 2021 · Wongpakaran et al. (2021)
17
3
M = 3.58 ± 2.05
Secure (secure)
1/ 7
Comfort with intimacy and autonomy, positive view of self and others.
items1
cliniquemixed · pathology: Psychiatric disorders · Thailand · n = 168 · 2021 · Wongpakaran et al. (2021)
17
1
M = 3.57 ± 1.82
Have your patient take this test
Assign it in one click: your patient answers on their phone, you receive the score and its interpretation.
The RQ measures an individual's dominant attachment orientation by evaluating their internal models of self (attachment anxiety) and others (attachment avoidance). It translates these cognitive-emotional schemas into four distinct prototypes, allowing clinicians to trace how underlying core beliefs attract thoughts and selectively filter relational evidence.
Model of Self: Reflects the degree of attachment anxiety, capturing internal beliefs about one's worthiness of love and the fear of rejection.
Model of Others: Reflects the degree of attachment avoidance, assessing whether others are perceived as trustworthy and available, or unreliable and intrusive.
Interpersonal Proximity: Evaluates the patient's comfort level with emotional closeness and interdependence.
Autonomy versus Dependency: Probes how the individual balances the human need for connection with the rigid drive for self-sufficiency.
This instrument is intended for use with adults, providing crucial insight into the relational patterns of individuals presenting with interpersonal difficulties, emotional dysregulation, or emotional dependency.
When and why to use it
Clinicians deploy the RQ to rapidly conceptualize a patient's interpersonal framework and to guide interventions targeting relational distress. It serves as an excellent orienting tool during the assessment phase, providing a clear map of the defensive structures protecting the patient's core vulnerabilities.
Intake conceptualization: Provides an immediate overview of the patient's relational blueprint, helping structure early case formulation.
Exploring interpersonal loops: Helps trace the self-fulfilling prophecies that sustain dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs and styles across multiple contexts.
Couples therapy baseline: Identifies the interactional dynamics between partners, highlighting how mismatched attachment needs trigger escalating conflict.
Targeting vulnerability blocks: Useful when patients struggle with expressing vulnerability in relationships, shedding light on the underlying fears driving emotional withdrawal.
Monitoring clinical progress: Serves as a repeatable measure to evaluate whether the patient is successfully building secure attachment behaviors over time.
Relying on a validated metric rather than clinical impression alone anchors the therapeutic process in objective data, giving both the clinician and the patient a concrete, shared vocabulary to discuss ingrained relational patterns.
Clinical library
750+ clinical tools
A library built with and for clinicians, ready to use in session and extend between appointments.
Following are descriptions of four general relationship styles that people often report. Please read each description and indicate, on a scale of 1 to 7, how well each corresponds to your general relationship style.
1. Style A (Secure). It is easy for me to become emotionally close to others. I am comfortable depending on them and having them depend on me. I don't worry about being alone or about others not accepting me.
This item evaluates the secure attachment prototype, indicating comfort with intimacy and an absence of abandonment fears.
Not at all like me
2
3
Somewhat like me
5
6
Very much like me
2. Style B (Fearful). I am somewhat uncomfortable getting close to others. I want emotionally close relationships, but I find it difficult to trust others completely or to depend on them. I worry that I will be hurt if I allow myself to become too close to others.
This item assesses the fearful-avoidant style, highlighting a conflict between the desire for connection and a pervasive distrust of others.
Not at all like me
2
3
Somewhat like me
5
6
Very much like me
3. Style C (Preoccupied). I want to be completely emotionally intimate with others, but I often find that others are reluctant to get as close as I would like. I am uncomfortable without close relationships, but I sometimes worry that others don't value me as much as I value them.
This item measures the preoccupied prototype, capturing high relational anxiety, fear of unreciprocated feelings, and overdependence.
Not at all like me
2
3
Somewhat like me
5
6
Very much like me
4. Style D (Dismissing). I am comfortable without close emotional relationships. It is very important to me to feel independent and self-sufficient, and I prefer not to depend on others or have others depend on me.
This item probes the dismissing-avoidant style, characterized by a defensive minimization of relational needs and a rigid reliance on self-sufficiency.